The difference between Editorial and Commercial Stock Photography

Cutcaster By Cutcaster, 13th Jun 2011 | Follow this author | RSS Feed | Short URL
Posted in Wikinut>Guides>Art>Photography

This article describes the difference between Editorial and Commercial Stock Photography for photographers looking to sell their images as stock photography.

The difference between Editorial and Commercial Stock Photography

The Difference:

Commercial stock photography can be used in posters, ads, promotional brochures, etc. that advertise and/or endorse services or products. One could define it as any photography for which the photographer is paid for images rather than works of art. Commercial images usually include: better than average to normal looking, everyday people or models; subject matter that is politically correct; or the year's latest trends, colors and hues. These photos frequently are taken by a commissioned photographer on assignment, or or licensed via a stock photography agency like All images included in commercial stock photography must have a model release signed by the person depicted in the image, since commercial photos purpose are to endorse or help sell a product/brand.

Editorial stock photos are used in magazines, as illustrations in books, educational materials, informational periodicals and electronic media, etc. Generally these images illustrate a story or idea within the context of a published piece of work. Editorial stock photos can include people in real-life situations and capture a specific real life moment in time. Photojournalism is considered a subset of editorial photography. Photographs shot in this context are accepted as a documentation of a newsworthy event. Obviously editorial photos are inherently more unique and content-specific than their counterpart, commercial stock photos. Editorial buyers look for "authentic" pictures, not images that appear staged. Model releases are not needed for editorial usage, in most cases, because their purpose is to educate and inform.

moderator Mark Gordon Brown moderated this page.
If you have any complaints about this content, please let us know


author avatar Mark Gordon Brown
13th Jun 2011 (#)

Most people who write for sites like this need to realize that every picture they find on the Internet is NOT necessarily legal for them to use. I try to tell people over and over that google images, and bing images are often protected by copyrights. I usually use my own images or ones from places that distribute copyright free images, I nearly always state my source.
Good info here to help people understand.
thanks for the link

Reply to this comment

author avatar Cutcaster
14th Jun 2011 (#)

How do we remove the above comment spam and then my comment from this article?

Reply to this comment

Add a comment
Can't login?